10-20-2020
Alex Sidles, Bricklin and Newman LLP
on behalf of
James Walsh
Third Comment on the Ambleside proposal.
Opinion: District should decline to enter into a new DEA with the Ambleside developer.
The objections expressed herein are in addition to those expressed in our December and July letters, none of which have been addressed. Our December and July letters contain additional grounds for declining a new DEA, including unlawful encroachment on wetland and stream buffers and the likelihood that the project (including the proposed aboveground sewer and supporting structures) will not survive environmental review.
Finally, a word on transparency: The District has never explained to Mr. Walsh, despite his inquiries, what its standards are for approving or disapproving this DEA. In addition, the District has never shared with Mr. Walsh the information in its possession regarding the Ambleside application. We ask the District to please explain the standards it will use to approve or disapprove this request for DEA, and to provide to Mr. Walsh any information in its possession regarding the Ambleside application.